Job-Change Words in Korean and Japanese: 転職, 이직 and 退社
Why do the same Chinese characters mean different things?
In Korean, changing jobs is called 이직 (移職) — literally 'move one's job.' In Japanese, the same act is called 転職 (tenshoku) — literally 'change/turn one's job.' Both mean 'change jobs,' but they use different kanji.
The problem goes deeper.
이직 — Korean vs Japanese
| Korean | Japanese | |
|---|---|---|
| 이직 | 移職 — move to another company (positive) | 離職 (rishoku) — leave one's job (resignation, unemployment) |
In Korean, 이직 uses 移 (move), implying a positive career move. In Japanese, 離職 uses 離 (separate/leave), meaning leaving employment — becoming unemployed.
If a Korean says "이직했다" in Japan, the listener understands "I became unemployed." Completely opposite.
전직 — Another trap
| Korean | Japanese | |
|---|---|---|
| 전직 | 前職 — previous job ("former teacher") | 転職 (tenshoku) — change jobs (= Korean 이직) |
Korean 전직 uses 前 (previous) = 'former job.' Japanese 転職 uses 転 (turn/change) = 'changing jobs.'
퇴사 — Yet another trap
| Korean | Japanese | |
|---|---|---|
| 퇴사 (退社) | Resign from the company (= quit) | Leave the office for the day (= go home after work) |
In Korean, 퇴사 means 'I quit the company.' In Japanese, 退社 (taisha) primarily means 'I left the office for today' = clocking out. It CAN mean 'resign,' but in daily usage it overwhelmingly means 'going home.' If a Korean reports '退社しました' in a Japanese office, colleagues will just think they went home.
Summary: Same act, different words
| Action | Korean | Japanese |
|---|---|---|
| Change company | 이직 (移職) | 転職 (tenshoku) |
| Quit/leave job | 퇴직 (退職) / 퇴사 (退社) | 離職 (rishoku) / 退職 |
| Go home from work | 퇴근 (退勤) | 退社 (taisha) / 退勤 |
| Previous job | 전직 (前職) | 前職 (zenshoku) — same! |
Only 前職 has the same meaning in both. The rest are all mismatched. 退社 is the most dangerous — 'resigned' in Korean vs 'went home' in Japanese.
Why the difference?
Both Korean and Japanese use Chinese characters, but after modernization, each language coined new compound words independently. Different character choices for the same concept led to identical kanji combinations having different meanings — a classic false friends problem, particularly dangerous in business Japanese.
Bonus: Why 전직 sounds weird in Korean
Using 전직 to mean 'change jobs' sounds unnatural in Korean. Saying '전직했습니다' would confuse most Koreans — 전직 ONLY means 'previous job' in Korean.
One exception: gaming. In RPGs, 전직(転職) is used for class changes — a direct import from Japanese game terminology.
Misunderstandings that actually happen
Scenario 1: 전직
A (Japanese, to a Korean): I did 전직(転職) recently!
B (Korean): Huh? 전직?? What class? Warrior? Mage? (thinks of RPG class change)
A: No, I changed companies...
In Korean, 전직 is rarely used in daily life — it's mostly associated with RPG class changes, so that's the first thing that comes to mind.
Scenario 2: 이직
A (Korean, in Japanese): I did 이직(離職)!
B (Japanese): Huh? Unemployed...? Are you okay?
A: No, I moved to a BETTER company!
Scenario 3: 퇴사
A (Korean, at Japanese office): I'm going to 퇴사(退社) now.
B (Japanese colleague): Sure, good work today~ (thinks: going home)
A: (packing boxes) Thank you for everything.
B: ...Wait, you're QUITTING?!
All three use the same kanji words but mean completely different things. This actually happens to Koreans working in Japan.
Key Points
Korean "이직" (移職) = change company ↔ Japanese "離職" = leave job/unemployment
Korean "전직" (前職) = previous job ↔ Japanese "転職" = change jobs
Only "前職" has the same meaning in both. The rest are all mismatched.
One of the most critical false friends in business Japanese